Generative AI's Transformative Role in Computer Science Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pedagogical Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19917943Keywords:
Generative AI, Computer Science Education, Large Language Models, Academic Integrity, Pedagogical Reform, Personalized Learning, Ethical AIAbstract
The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs) capable of generating coherent text and functional code, is catalyzing a paradigm shift in Computer Science (CS) education. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of GenAI's dual impact, examining its immense potential to optimize teaching content, personalize learning, and innovate instructional models, while concurrently investigating its profound challenges to academic integrity, assessment authenticity, and learning outcomes. Through systematic review of empirical studies and theoretical frameworks, we analyze pedagogical opportunities afforded by GenAI tools like code assistants and intelligent tutors, and document the rising incidence of AI-assisted plagiarism. Our findings emphasize the critical need for educators to reform curricula, redesign assessments to focus on higher-order thinking, and establish clear ethical guidelines to harness GenAI's transformative power while preserving the integrity and quality of CS education. The study concludes with evidence-based recommendations for sustainable GenAI integration that balances innovation with pedagogical responsibility.
References
Alvarado, C., & Dodds, Z. (2023). Integrating Generative AI into Computer Science Education: Opportunities and Challenges. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 23(4), 1-19.
Kori, K., & Pedaste, M. (2024). Faculty Trust and Adoption of Generative AI Tools in Computer Science Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(3), 505-528.
Pane, J. F., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Block-based Programming and the Democratization of Computing Education. Computers & Education, 181, 104460.
Brown, T., & Bansal, A. (2023). Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models in Education. IEEE Access, 11, 122345-122360.
Lewis, D., & Qian, Y. (2024). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Domain-Specific Learning Support in Computer Science. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100195.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). Adaptive and Personalized Learning in Programming Education: A Systematic Review. Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 45-63.
Lin, Y. H., & Liu, C. C. (2023). AI-Lab: A Scaffolding Framework for Generative AI Use in Programming Courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 215-230.
Chen, K. T., & Wu, Y. P. (2023). Enhancing Non-IT Students' Programming Learning through LINE Bot Chat Support. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7311-7330.
García, P., & Ortega, M. (2024). AI-Powered Feedback in Database Administration Courses: Effects on Learning Outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107232.
Ahmed, S., & Li, J. (2023). Conversational AI Chatbots for Programming Education: From Rule-Based to Generative Models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 355-372.
Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2023). Regional Disparities in Computer Science Education in China: Challenges and Prospects of AI Integration. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 6113-6131.
Cheng, L., & Sun, Y. (2023). Experiential Robotics Projects Enhanced by Generative AI in Computer Science Education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(2), 150-162.
Chatterjee, A., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). Plagiarism and Integrity Challenges in the Age of GPT-AI. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4240.
Becker, B. A., & Shadiev, R. (2023). Assessing ChatGPT's Impact on Student Behavior in Introductory Programming (CS1) Courses. SIGCSE Bulletin, 55(1), 201-210.
Bender, E. M., & Gebru, T. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM FAccT Conference, 610-623.
Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2023). Regional Disparities in Computer Science Education in China: Challenges and Prospects of AI Integration. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 6113-6131.
Suen, H. K., & Park, J. (2024). Student Perceptions, Motivation, and Trust in GenAI for Learning Support. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100280.
Al-Smadi, M., & Qureshi, N. (2023). Faculty Awareness and Integration of Generative AI in Engineering Education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(3), 241-255.
Morales, R., & Chen, X. (2024). Public Perceptions and Sentiment Analysis of AI in Education: A Social Media Study. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107101.
Yang, D., & Li, P. (2024). Eye-Tracking Research on Code Comprehension with AI-Assisted Summarization. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), 257-276.
Singh, N., & Patel, R. (2023). Longitudinal Mixed-Method Study of Student Adoption of GenAI in Computer Science. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8931-8947.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY 4.0 deed)
